Scraping vs Scrapping: Which to Pick
- Scraping (one p) is the data term: extracting data by automated means from a page or screen. Scrapping (two p's) is the present participle of scrap, meaning to discard, abandon, or fight.
- For web data extraction, scraping is correct 100% of the time. Scrapping in that context is a misspelling, which Wiktionary lists explicitly as a 'misspelling of scraping.'
- The double p comes from the spelling rule for short verbs: scrap ends in consonant-vowel-consonant and doubles to scrapping; scrape ends in a silent e and drops it to scraping.
- There is no tooling called 'scrapping.' Web scraping maps to real tools: free libraries (Beautiful Soup, Scrapy) and scraper APIs like ChocoData from $19/mo per its mid-2026 pricing page.
- Performance figures here are approximate, compiled from vendor-published data and public sources, not first-hand benchmarks (those are pending; how we test).
“Scraping vs scrapping” looks like a tool comparison, but it is a spelling question with a data-engineering answer. One word, scraping, is the term for pulling data off web pages. The other, scrapping, means throwing something away or fighting over it. They sound almost identical, they differ by one letter, and only one of them belongs in a sentence about extracting data. This piece defines both, shows why the spellings split, maps each to the tools that actually exist (one maps to a real toolchain, the other to none), and gives a clear answer for which to use. Where the toolchain points at ChocoData, the scraper API this site promotes, I keep it factual and let the numbers stand.
What is the difference between scraping and scrapping?
Scraping means extracting data; scrapping means discarding or fighting. They are the -ing forms of two different verbs that happen to look alike. “Scrape” (one p) in computing means, per Wiktionary, to “extract data by automated means from a format not intended to be machine-readable, such as a screenshot or a formatted web page.” “Scrap” (the base of the two-p form) means, per Wiktionary, “to discard; to get rid of,” “to stop working on a project indefinitely,” or “to fight.” Add -ing to each and you get two words one letter apart with opposite jobs.
Here is the contrast in one table.
| Axis | Scraping (one p) | Scrapping (two p’s) |
|---|---|---|
| Base verb | scrape | scrap |
| Core meaning | Extract data from a page or screen | Discard, abandon, or fight |
| Field it belongs to | Web data, software, automation | Recycling, project management, slang |
| Example sentence | ”We are scraping product prices nightly." | "We are scrapping the old crawler for a rewrite.” |
| Correct for web data? | Yes, always | No, it is a misspelling there |
| Tooling that exists | Libraries, scraper APIs, frameworks | None (it is not a data technique) |
The takeaway is plain. If your sentence is about getting data, the word is scraping. If your sentence is about getting rid of something, the word is scrapping. The two never overlap in a data-extraction context.
Why does the spelling change between scrape and scrap?
The double p in scrapping comes from a standard English rule for short verbs, and scraping skips it because of a silent e. When a one-syllable verb ends in a single consonant-vowel-consonant pattern, you double the final consonant before adding -ing. “Scrap” is c-r-a-p, consonant-vowel-consonant, so it doubles to “scrapping.” “Scrape” ends in a silent e, and the rule there is to drop the e before -ing, giving “scraping.” Same suffix, two base words, two different spelling rules.
A few parallel pairs make the pattern obvious.
| Base verb | Pattern | Add -ing | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| scrape | ends in silent e | scraping | drop the e |
| tape | ends in silent e | taping | drop the e |
| hope | ends in silent e | hoping | drop the e |
| scrap | consonant-vowel-consonant | scrapping | double the p |
| tap | consonant-vowel-consonant | tapping | double the p |
| hop | consonant-vowel-consonant | hopping | double the p |
Notice the minimal pairs: “taping” (with tape) versus “tapping” (with tap), “hoping” versus “hopping.” Scraping versus scrapping is the same split. The single p signals the long-a verb “scrape,” the data word. The double p signals the short-a verb “scrap,” the discard word.
When is “scrapping” actually the right word?
Scrapping is correct whenever you mean discarding, abandoning, or fighting, none of which involve data extraction. It is a real English word with everyday uses; it is simply the wrong word for web data. Wiktionary lists it both as the legitimate present participle of “scrap” and, separately, as a “misspelling of scraping,” which captures the whole problem: the word exists, but people reach for it in the wrong context.
Here is when each spelling is correct.
| You mean | Correct word | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Extract data from pages | scraping | ”A nightly job scraping competitor prices.” |
| Throw something out | scrapping | ”We are scrapping the legacy database.” |
| Cancel or abandon a plan | scrapping | ”Management is scrapping the Q3 launch.” |
| Send metal or a car to scrap | scrapping | ”He is scrapping the old truck for parts.” |
| Fighting or arguing (informal) | scrapping | ”The two teams were scrapping over budget.” |
| Build a data pipeline | scraping | ”Scraping reviews into a sentiment model.” |
So “we are scrapping the scraper” is a valid, if confusing, sentence: it means you are throwing away the program that does the scraping. In a data context that is the only time the two-p spelling shows up correctly, and it means you are ending the work, not doing it.
Which spelling maps to real scraping tools?
Only scraping (one p) maps to a toolchain; there is no tool, library, or API named “scrapping.” This is the practical tell. When you search for how to do the thing, every real result, every library, every paid API, uses the one-p spelling. If a tutorial, package, or product spells it “scrapping,” that is a typo, not a different category of software. Here is what the correct term actually maps to, with hosted prices pulled from each vendor’s own pricing page in mid-2026.
| Tool | Spelling it uses | Type | Starting price | What it does |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beautiful Soup | scraping | Open source | Free | Parses HTML; pair with an HTTP client |
| Scrapy | scraping | Open source | Free | Full crawl-and-scrape framework |
| ChocoData | scraping | Scraper API | $19/mo (Vibe) | Fetch + parse a URL, anti-bot handled |
| ScrapingBee | scraping | Scraper API | $49/mo (Freelance) | Headless Chrome rendering, premium proxies |
| ScraperAPI | scraping | Scraper API | $49/mo (Hobby) | Proxy rotation, JS rendering, free trial |
| ”scrapping” tools | n/a | none exist | n/a | No such category |
The build-versus-buy split is the same one I cover across this site. Free libraries like Beautiful Soup and Scrapy cost nothing to license but carry infrastructure and maintenance once a target fights back: you build proxy rotation, handle bans, and babysit the queue. Scraper APIs charge per successful request and remove that blocking work. The full mechanics live in the web scraping pillar guide and the Python scraping guide.
ChocoData’s documented pricing, from its pricing page in mid-2026:
| Plan | Price | Included requests | Concurrency |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 (no card) | 1,000 requests/mo (5,000 credits) | 10 |
| Vibe | $19/mo | 27,000 requests/mo (135,000 credits) | 30 |
| Pro | $49/mo | 82,000 requests/mo (410,000 credits) | 50 |
| Custom | $100 to $2k/mo | 200,000 to 4,000,000+ requests/mo | 100 to 500+ |
ChocoData prices one request at 5 credits, with JS rendering adding 10 credits, and lists pay-as-you-go top-ups at $0.90 per 1,000 successful requests per its pricing page in mid-2026. It bills only 2xx responses. It exposes a universal endpoint plus 453 dedicated endpoints, so you hand it a URL and it returns clean JSON. See ChocoData.
How fast is web scraping, and does spelling affect performance?
Spelling has zero effect on performance; only the toolchain does, and the toolchain only exists under the one-p spelling. Since “scrapping” maps to no software, there is nothing to benchmark on that side. For real web scraping, performance depends on whether you run your own code or call a hosted API. The figures below are approximate, compiled from vendor-published data and aggregated public reports, not bestscraperapi.com first-hand benchmarks. My like-for-like tests are pending; see how we test.
| Dimension | Self-run scraper (Scrapy + parser) | Scraper API (e.g. ChocoData) |
|---|---|---|
| What you optimize | Throughput, coverage | Latency, success rate per URL |
| Approx. speed | Hundreds of pages/min on one box (target permitting) | Median ~2.6s per request, p95 ~6s (ChocoData homepage, mid-2026) |
| Anti-bot handling | You build it (proxies, headers, solvers) | Built in (residential IPs, retries) |
| Scaling cost | Your servers + proxy bandwidth | Per successful request |
| Maintenance | You patch bans and layout drift | Vendor maintains the fetch layer |
The honest read: raw throughput against an unprotected site is highest with your own code, because there is no per-request API overhead. Once targets push back with blocks and JavaScript walls, a hosted API’s per-URL success rate is what saves the project. Treat the latency figure as directional and confirm it at the source; defenses are the topic of scraping without getting blocked.
Which should you use: scraping or scrapping?
Use scraping (one p) for anything involving web data; that answer does not bend. The decision is not a tradeoff between two techniques, because only one of these words names a technique. Here is the scenario-to-spelling mapping.
| Your situation | Use | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Writing code, docs, or a query about data extraction | scraping | It is the only correct term for the activity |
| Searching for a library or API to extract data | scraping | No product is named “scrapping” |
| Describing throwing away a project or asset | scrapping | Correct present participle of “scrap” |
| Naming a job, repo, or function for extraction | scraping | Matches every tool and tutorial you will hit |
| Talking about a fight or argument (informal) | scrapping | Correct, but unrelated to data |
Three concrete recommendations:
- You want to pull data off web pages. The word is scraping, every time. Reach for a free parser like Beautiful Soup for a few static pages, or a scraper API such as ChocoData from $19/mo when the targets fight back. Start at the web scraping pillar guide.
- You typed “web scrapping” and landed here. It was a typo, and you wanted web scraping. Nothing is lost: the one-p spelling is what every tool and guide uses, and the rest of this site is written that way.
- You genuinely mean discarding something. Then scrapping is right, and you are talking about ending work, not doing it. “We are scrapping the crawler” means you are throwing the program away.
The short version: scraping is the data word, scrapping is the discard word, and for web extraction the single p wins outright. Spell it “scraping,” pick the tool from the table above, and you are aimed at real software instead of a search-engine dead end.
FAQ
No. For pulling data off web pages, the verb is 'scrape' and the activity is 'scraping' with one p. 'Scrapping' with two p's is the present participle of 'scrap' (discard, abandon, fight). It is correct in sentences like 'we are scrapping the old pipeline,' meaning you are throwing it away, which is the opposite of building one.
English doubles a final consonant before -ing when a one-syllable verb ends in consonant-vowel-consonant: scrap becomes scrapping. Verbs that end in a silent e drop the e: scrape becomes scraping. Same -ing ending, two different base words, two different rules.
Yes, it is a common typo because the two words sound similar and the double-consonant rule is easy to over-apply. If you typed 'web scrapping' looking for data extraction, you wanted 'web scraping.' Everything on this site about extraction uses the one-p spelling.